Gastherausgeberschaften
Jucks, R. & Hendriks, F. (2021). Introduction: Language and Communication Related to COVID-19. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5-6), 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211045728
Rosman, T., Edelsbrunner, P., Hendriks F., & Wingen, T. (2022). Call for Papers: Psychological Perspectives on Science Communication. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000493 (Topical Issue in Preparation, now also joined by Vaupotic, N.)
Artikel in Fachzeitschriften (Peer Reviewed)
Hendriks, F., & Bromme, R. (2022). Researchers’ Public Engagement in the Context of Interdisciplinary Research Programs: Learning and Reflection from Boundary Crossing. Science Communication, 44(6), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221137052
Hendriks, F., Janssen, I., & Jucks, R. (2022). Balance as credibility? How presenting one- vs. two-sided messages affects ratings of scientists’ and politicians’ trustworthiness. Health Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2111638
Wintterlin, F., Hendriks, F., Mede, N. G., Bromme, R., Metag, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2022). Predicting Public Trust in Science: The Role of Basic Orientations Toward Science, Perceived Trustworthiness of Scientists, and Experiences With Science. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.822757
Janssen, I., Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2021). Face Masks Might Protect You From COVID-19: The Communication of Scientific Uncertainty by Scientists Versus Politicians in the Context of Policy in the Making. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,40(5-6), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211044512
Menz, C., Spinath, B., Hendriks, F., & Seifried, E. (2021). Reducing educational psychological misconceptions: How effective are standard lectures, refutation lectures, and instruction in information evaluation strategies? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000269
Hendriks, F.*, Seifried, E.*, & Menz, C. (2021). Unraveling the “Smart but Evil” Stereotype: Pre-service Teachers’ Evaluations of Educational Psychology Researchers versus Teachers as Sources of Information. Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 35(2-3), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000300 (* = shared first authorship)
Hendriks, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., Felton, M., Iordanou, K., Jucks, R., & Zimmermann, M. (2020). Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement with Scientific Information—A Literature Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572744
Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2020). Does Scientific Uncertainty in News Articles Affect Readers’ Trust and Decision-Making? Media and Communication, 8(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2824
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. (2020). Replication Crisis = Trust Crisis? The Effect of Successful vs. Failed Replications on Laypeople's Trust in Researchers and Research. Public Understanding of Science, 29(3), 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520902383
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Disclose Your Flaws! Admission Positively Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of an Expert Science Blogger. Studies in Communication Sciences, 16(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2016.10.003
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Evoking Vigilance: Would You (Dis)Trust a Scientist Who Discusses Ethical Implications of Research in a Science Blog? Public Understanding of Science, 25(8), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516646048
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. (2015). Measuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI). PLoS ONE 10(10): e0139309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309
Buchkapitel, Beiträge in Sammelbänden und Konferenz-Archiven
Bromme, R. & Hendriks, F. (forthcoming). Trust in Science: When the Public Considers Whom to Trust - the Example of COVID-19. In R. C. Mayer & B. M. Mayer (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Trust: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing. Pre-Print available at https://psyarxiv.com/t754d
Hendriks, F., Distel, B., Engelke, K. M., Westmattelmann, D., & Wintterlin, F. (2021). Methodological and Practical Challenges of Interdisciplinary Trust Research. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication in a Digitized World: Empirical Results and Implications (pp. 29-57). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_2
Hendriks, F., & Kienhues, D. (2019). Science understanding between scientific literacy and trust: contributions from psychological and educational research. In A. Leßmöllmann, M. Dascal, & T. Gloning (Eds.), Science Communication (pp. 29–50). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255522-002
Dunwoody, S., Hendriks, F., Massarani, L. & Peters, H. P. (2018). How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty and what that means for the audience. Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST), 3-6 April 2018, Dunedin, New Zealand. Retrieved from the PCST Archive of Conference Papers: https://pcst.co/archive/conference/paper/225
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in Science and the Science of Trust. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication in a Digitized World. Models and Concepts of Trust Research (pp. 239–251). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2
Westphal, S., Hendriks, F., & Malik, M. (2015). Vertrauenswürdigkeit ohne Vertrauen? Wie die Kommunikation wissenschaftlicher Unsicherheiten die Bewertungen und Entscheidungen von Rezipienten beeinflusst. In Schäfer, M. S., Kristiansen S., Bonfadelli, H. (Ed.): Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel (pp. 342–365). Herbert von Halem.
