Dr. Friederike Hendriks

• Wissenschaftskommunikation
• Vertrauen in Wissenschaft
• epistemisches Vertrauen
• kommunizierende Wissenschaftler*innen

• Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs)
• European Association for Learning and Instruction (EARLI)
• Network for the Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST)

Artikel in Fachzeitschriften (Peer Reviewed)

Wintterlin, F., Hendriks, F., Mede, N. G., Bromme, R., Metag, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2022). Predicting Public Trust in Science: The Role of Basic Orientations Toward Science, Perceived Trustworthiness of Scientists, and Experiences With Science. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.822757

Janssen, I., Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2021). Face Masks Might Protect You From COVID-19: The Communication of Scientific Uncertainty by Scientists Versus Politicians in the Context of Policy in the Making. Journal of Language and Social Psychology,40(5-6), 601-625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211044512

Menz, C., Spinath, B., Hendriks, F., & Seifried, E. (2021). Reducing educational psychological misconceptions: How effective are standard lectures, refutation lectures, and instruction in information evaluation strategies? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000269

Hendriks, F.*, Seifried, E.*, & Menz, C. (2021). Unraveling the “Smart but Evil” Stereotype: Pre-service Teachers’ Evaluations of Educational Psychology Researchers versus Teachers as Sources of Information. Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 35(2-3), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000300 (* = shared first authorship)

Hendriks, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., Felton, M., Iordanou, K., Jucks, R., & Zimmermann, M. (2020). Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement with Scientific Information—A Literature Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572744

Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2020). Does Scientific Uncertainty in News Articles Affect Readers’ Trust and Decision-Making? Media and Communication, 8(2), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2824

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. (2020). Replication Crisis = Trust Crisis? The Effect of Successful vs. Failed Replications on Laypeople's Trust in Researchers and Research. Public Understanding of Science, 29(3), 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520902383 

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Disclose Your Flaws! Admission Positively Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of an Expert Science Blogger. Studies in Communication Sciences, 16(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2016.10.003

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Evoking Vigilance: Would You (Dis)Trust a Scientist Who Discusses Ethical Implications of Research in a Science Blog? Public Understanding of Science, 25(8), 992–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516646048

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. (2015). Measuring Laypeople's Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI). PLoS ONE 10(10): e0139309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309

Buchkapitel, Beiträge in Sammelbänden und Konferenz-Archiven

Bromme, R. & Hendriks, F. (forthcoming). Trust in Science: When the Public Considers Whom to Trust - the Example of COVID-19. In R. C. Mayer & B. M. Mayer (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Trust: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing. Pre-Print available at https://psyarxiv.com/t754d

Hendriks, F., Distel, B., Engelke, K. M., Westmattelmann, D., & Wintterlin, F. (2021). Methodological and Practical Challenges of Interdisciplinary Trust Research. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication in a Digitized World: Empirical Results and Implications (pp. 29-57). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_2

Hendriks, F., & Kienhues, D. (2019). Science understanding between scientific literacy and trust: contributions from psychological and educational research. In A. Leßmöllmann, M. Dascal, & T. Gloning (Eds.), Science Communication (pp. 29–50). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255522-002

Dunwoody, S., Hendriks, F., Massarani, L. & Peters, H. P. (2018). How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty and what that means for the audience. Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST), 3-6 April 2018, Dunedin, New Zealand. Retrieved from the PCST Archive of Conference Papers: https://pcst.co/archive/conference/paper/225

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in Science and the Science of Trust. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication in a Digitized World. Models and Concepts of Trust Research (pp. 239–251). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2

Westphal, S., Hendriks, F., & Malik, M. (2015). Vertrauenswürdigkeit ohne Vertrauen? Wie die Kommunikation wissenschaftlicher Unsicherheiten die Bewertungen und Entscheidungen von Rezipienten beeinflusst. In Schäfer, M. S., Kristiansen S., Bonfadelli, H. (Ed.): Wissenschaftskommunikation im Wandel (pp. 342-365). Herbert von Halem.

Gastherausgeberschaft

Jucks, R. & Hendriks, F. (2021). Introduction: Language and Communication Related to COVID-19. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(5-6), 539-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211045728

Hendriks, F. (2022). Science Communication and its Role for Public Trust in Science. Invited Presentation at the conference “Science for Resilience – Learnings from the Pandemic”. Vienna, Austria (Online).

Hendriks, F. (2022). Die Rolle des öffentlichen Vertrauens in Wissenschaft für Kommunikation und Transfer von Forschung. Eingeladener Vortrag beim Workshop der Österreichischen Forschungsgemeinschaft (ÖFG) “Die dritte Mission von Universitäten“ . Wien, Österreich.

Hendriks, F. (2021). Informed Trust in Science as a Way of Dealing with Science in Daily Life. Keynote presented at the Junior Researchers of EARLI (JURE) conference, Gothenburg, Sweden (Online).

Menz, C., Spinath, B., Hendriks, F., & Seifried, E. (2021). Refutations: pädagogisch-psychologische Fehlvorstellungen reduzieren und Metakognition fördern. Beitrag präsentiert auf der Fachgruppentagung Pädagogische Psychologie (PaePsy), Online/Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Menz, C., Spinath, B., Hendriks, F., & Seifried, E. (2021). Reducing educational psychological misconceptions and enhancing metacognitive monitoring accuracy. Paper presented at the Biannual Conference of the European Society for Psychology Learning and Teaching (ESPLAT), Online/Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., Mayweg-Paus, E., & Zimmermann, M. (2021). "Is this credible information?" Investigations on the Evaluation of Scientific Online Information. Symposium organized at the 19th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Online/Gothenburg, Sweden.

Jannsen, I., Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2021) “Mask wearing might be effective!” Does uncertainty communication affect source evaluation?Paper presented at the 19th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Online/Gothenburg, Sweden.

Janssen, I., Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2021). Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in the Context of the Corona Pandemic: How does the Use of Lexical Hedges Affect the Perceived Trustworthiness of Scientists and Politicians? Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse (ST&D), Online/Chicago, USA.

Barel-Ben David, Y., Enzigmüller, C., Hendriks, F., & Peters, H. P. (2021). Communicating their own research: What do we need to know about the role of scientists and researchers in science communication? Roundtable organized at the 16th Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) Conference. Aberdeen, UK.

Hendriks, F. (2021). What Makes People Attend to and Trust Science and Scientific Experts in Online Contexts? Joint paper session organized at the 16th Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) Conference. Aberdeen, UK.

Vaupotič, N., Hendriks, F., Gierth, L., & Kienhues, D. (2021). Grab a drink and talk science: How scientists adapt their talks for an informal science communication event. Paper presented at the 16th Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) Conference, Aberdeen, UK.

Janssen, I., Hendriks, F., & Jucks, I. (2020). Wirkt es auf ihre Vertrauenswürdigkeit, wenn Wissenschaftler*innen sich politisch äußern? Beitrag präsentiert auf dem Forum Wissenschaftskommunikation. Digitale Veranstaltung.

Hendriks, F., Kumpmann, N., & Jucks, R. (2019). Über psychologische Themen urteilen: Wie Methodenwissen zur Beurteilung eigener Strategien zur Informationssuche und Entscheidungsfindung beiträgt. Beitrag präsentiert auf der Fachtagung für Entwicklungs- und Pädagogische Psychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Leipzig, Deutschland.

Thomm, E., & Hendriks, F. (2019). Factors Influencing Source Preference and Evaluation When Dealing with Expert Knowledge.Symposium organized at the 18th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Aachen, Germany.

Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2019). Do Insights Into Research Methods Affect Trust in Scientists and Deference to Experts? Paper presented at the 18th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Aachen, Germany.

Kienhues, D., & Hendriks, F. (2019). Identifying literacies protective against misinformation and science skepticism. Symposium organized at the 18th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Aachen, Germany.

Kienhues, D., & Hendriks, F., Jucks, R. & Bromme, R. (2019). Strategies in Dealing with Science-Based Information. Paper presented at the 18th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Aachen, Germany.

Kiemer, K., Hendriks, F., Groß Ophoff, J., Seifried, E., & Menz, C. (2019). What is (needed to achieve) ‘evidence-based teaching’?. Roundtable at the 18th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, (EARLI), Aachen, Germany.

Hendriks, F. (2019). Epistemic Trust – Reasoning About Scientific Information. Roundtable participation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Toronto, Canada.

Kienhues, D., & Hendriks, F. (2018). Die Fake News-Problematik und ihre Konsequenzen für die Psychologie – Podiumsdiskussion.Podiumsdiskussion organisiert auf dem 51. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Frankfurt, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., & Kienhues, D. (2018). Epistemic Trust: A cornerstone in reasoning and deciding about complex science issues. Paper presented at the 51. Congress of the German Psychological Society (DGPs), Frankfurt, Germany.  

Hendriks, F., Ilse, T., & Jucks, R. (2018). Does knowledge about research methods help laypeople to deal with uncertainty in scientific evidence? Paper presented at the 51. Congress of the German Psychological Society (DGPs), Frankfurt, Germany.  

Hendriks, F. (2018). Scientific Uncertainty – Making Trust a Necessity? Paper presented at the 15th Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Hendriks, F., Niederhoff, D., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2018). Scientists’ views on their own engagement in science communication and outreach activities. Paper presented at the 15th Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Mayweg-Paus, E., Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2018). Der Einfluss von Kommunikationsstil und Voreinstellungen auf die Verarbeitung widersprüchlicher Befunde in Expertendiskussionen. Beitrag präsentiert auf der 6. Tagung der Gesellschaft für empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF), Basel, Schweiz.

Hendriks, F., & Niederhoff, D. (2017). Was haben Wissenschaftler von Wissenschaftskommunikation? – Eine Interviewstudie.Beitrag präsentiert auf dem 10. Forum Wissenschaftskommunikation, Braunschweig, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2017). Der Einfluss des Wissenschaftsverständnisses auf die Bewertung unterschiedlicher Qualitäten der Evidenz von wissenschaftlichen Aussagen. Beitrag präsentiert auf der Fachtagung für Entwicklungs- und Pädagogische Psychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Münster, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., & Rinehart R. W. (2017). Dealing with Health Information: Evaluation of Scientific Evidence and Expert Sources. Symposium organized at the 17th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Tampere, Finland.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2017). How Scientific Literacy Benefits Laypeople’s Persuasiveness Judgments About Scientific Evidence. Paper presented at the 17th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Tampere, Finland.

Bromme, R., & Hendriks, F. (2017). Trust in science as an interpersonal matter: Effects of pragmatic expectations. Paper presented at the research workshop of the Israel Science Foundation "Public Engagement with Science Online". Technion, Haifa, Israel.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2017). Knowledge of and about science benefits people’s shallow evidence evaluation.Poster presented at the research workshop of the Israel Science Foundation "Public Engagement with Science Online". Technion, Haifa, Israel.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2017). Können Replikationen die Glaubwürdigkeit von Forschungsergebnissen und die Vertrauenswürdigkeit von Forschern beeinflussen? Beitrag präsentiert auf der 1. Jahrestagung der Fachgruppe „Wissenschaftskommunikation“ der DGPuK, Landau, Deutschland.  

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Replications matter! The effect of replications on laypersons' trust in researchers and in their research. Paper presented at the 50. Congress of the German Psychological Society (DGPs), Leipzig, Germany.  

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). The effect of ethical concerns on source evaluation and argumentation about a socio-scientific issue. Paper presented at the 5th Biennial Meeting of the EARLI Special Interest Group 13 Moral & Democratic Education, Salzburg, Austria.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Laypeople’s inferences about a science blogger’s trustworthiness: Two experimental studies. Paper to be presented at the 14th Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.

Hendriks, F., & Kienhues, D. (2015). How Web 2.0 influences public understanding of science: Laypeople’s ways of dealing with, deciding on and engaging in science issues in digital media. Symposium organized at the 9th Conference of the Media Psychology Division (German Psychological Society, DGPs), Tübingen, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2015). Differences in students’ trustworthiness assessments of a science blogger depending on the source of a disclosure of ethical concerns. Contributed to the 9th Conference of the Media Psychology Division (German Psychological Society, DGPs), Tübingen, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2015). The effect of ethical concerns on source evaluation and argumentation about a socio-scientific issue. Paper presented at the 16th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Limassol, Cyprus. This paper received the Maslovaty Foundation Award 2015 for the best EARLI SIG 13 Young Researcher's Paper Presentation.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2015). Deciding what might be true: Reasoning about the content or about the source of an argument. Paper presented at the 16th biannial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Limassol, Cyprus.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2015). Non-mediated science communication: Science blogs and their impact on trust in scientists. Paper presented at the international workshop “Innovations and Advances in Survey-Based Research on Public Attitudes towards Science”, Castle Rauischholzhausen, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2015). Ethical Arguments in science blogging: their effects on perceived expert trustworthiness and decisions about a socio-scientific issue. Paper presented at the Workshop "Motivated Science Reception" of the DFG Priority Program “Science and the General Public”, Annweiler, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., & Kienhues, D. (2014). Vertrauensurteile in der Wissenschaftsrezeption: Die Messung von Vertrauen in Experten im Online-Kontext. Beitrag präsentiert auf der 49. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Bochum, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2014). Who has said it and why? Laypersons' reasoning about experts' arguments in science blogs. Paper presented at the Workshop "Arguing about scientific information" of the DFG Priority Program “Science and the General Public”, Münster, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2014). Ethical Arguments in science blogging: their effects on expert trustworthiness and ability to make decisions about the topic. Paper presented at the 4th Biennial Meeting of the EARLI Special Interest Group 13 Moral & Democratic Education, Verona, Italy.

Westphal S., & Hendriks F. (2014). Die Wirkung wissenschaftlicher Unsicherheiten auf Bewertungen und Entscheidungen der Rezipienten. Ein Online-Experiment am Beispiel von Gesundheitsinformationen im Internet. Beitrag präsentiert auf der 1. Jahrestagung der Ad-Hoc-Gruppe "Wissenschaftskommunikation" der DGPuK, Zürich, Schweiz.

Westphal S., & Hendriks, F. (2014). Vertrauenswürdigkeit ohne Vertrauen – wie die Kommunikation wissenschaftlicher Unsicherheiten in Online-Gesundheitsinformationen die Bewertungen und Entscheidungen der Rezipienten beeinflusst.Beitrag präsentiert auf der 2. Jahrestagung der Ad-Hoc-Gruppe "Gesundheitskommunikation" der DGPuK, Mainz, Deutschland.

Hendriks, F., & Kienhues, D. (2014). Dimensionen von Vertrauen in wissenschaftliche Autoren und ihre Implikationen für weitere Informationssuche. Poster präsentiert auf der 2. Tagung der Gesellschaft für empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF), Frankfurt.

Hendriks F., Kienhues D., & Bromme R. (2013). Die Glaubwürdigkeit wissenschaftlicher Autoren Online: Wie wirkt selbstoffenbarte Fragilität der Ergebnisse gegenüber extern geäußerter Kritik?. Beitrag präsentiert auf der 14. Fachtagung Pädagogische Psychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Hildesheim, Deutschland.

Hendriks F., Kienhues D., & Bromme R. (2013). Der Einfluss von Selbstlimitationen auf das Vertrauen in die Autoren wissenschaftlicher Informationen: eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Wissenschaftsblogs. Beitrag präsentiert auf der 14. Fachtagung Sozialpsychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), Hagen, Deutschland.